A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
The Cornell Law School website offers a range of information on legal topics, such as citation of case legislation, and in some cases delivers a video tutorial on case citation.
Its enforcement with the provision of capital punishment or life imprisonment underscores the value of human life plus the importance of maintaining legislation and order in society.
116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as established forth would not utilize, as the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, rather he is acquitted of your criminal charges based on evidence and it truly is properly-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted in the criminal case, then on this quite charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment through the department and held him disqualified to the post because acquittal for all foreseeable future purposes. The aforesaid proposition is established at naught because of the Supreme Court of Pakistan while in the case in the District Police Officer Mainwali and a couple of others v.
competent authority and if any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
record of your department there isn't any record available whatsoever regarding promotion in the petitioner(Promotion)
Power to levy tax and to legislate on immovable property which include tax on annual rental value of immovable property after 18th Amendment(CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973)
73 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Pertaining to the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of your Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice just isn't served, the grievance petition is usually dismissed. This is because service in the grievance notice is really a mandatory necessity along with a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation demands that a grievance notice be served about the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If your employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) When the organization is transprovincial.
The click here appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge to the Judgment within time. Read more
This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based to the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances on the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability within the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request on the appellate court.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It includes the execution from the convicted person being a consequence of their crime.
10. Without touching the merits of your case on the issue of annual increases during the pensionary emoluments of your petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, these types of once-a-year increase, if permissible from the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment to become made because of the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a result of funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement in the laws, the legal system adheres on the doctrine of stare decisis
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to watch that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are fully different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case law titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held with the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--